Leaks confirm weak rape case against Assange


The preliminary investigation report in the Assange rape case has been leaked and is available for anyone interested here. Only the fact that the preliminary investigation now is available to Julian Assange and the general public is a problem for the prosecutor, according to Anna Ardin and Sofia Wilen's defense lawyer, Claes Borgstrom, quoted in the Guardian "It is important for the future investigation that the suspect himself does not know more than necessary before he is interrogated by the Swedish police"  
I read the report and found that it confirms that Marianne Ny has no witnesses and no forensic evidence that proves, beyond doubt, that Assange is guilty of any crimes.
The infamous condom appear to be a random condom brought to the police by Anna Ardin, the forensic evidence found on the condom cannot prove that it was even used by Assange and it cannot prove when and how it was ripped, additionally the National Swedish Laboratory of Forensic Science (SKL) is not even ackredited to perform the tests they did.
The witnesses confirm the general assumption now being made by many that the women went to the police to get back at Assange. Some serious question on how the case has been handled by the police is also highlighted in the report. Most of the report though is filled with non-relevant ramblings on irrelevant issues and clearly show that Sofia Wilen, who appears to be a sperm/germ fobic stalker, who should have been sent to a psychotherapist by the police. Witnesses also confirm that Anna Ardin behaved like nothing had happened after the alleged rape, and even wanted to "give" Assange to one of her friends and could not care less if Assange had sex with Sofia Wilen who she referred to as a "random girl". It is interesting to see the sudden change in Anna Ardin's attitudes towards Sofia Wilen when she realises she can use her to get back at Assange. And thanks to the corrupt Swedish police and Swedish media, Ardin and her friends within the police and media could frame Assange for rape.

It looks like Ardin and Wilen went to a police station in central Stockholm, Klara, at a time Ardin knew her aquaintance, Irmeli Krans would be able to take their statements. One can question if it was according to protocol for a police to interrogate an aquaintance. The original protocol from the first interrogation with Sofia Wilen authored by Irmeli Krans is missing , Irmeli Krans was later told by police inspector Mats Gehlin to make some changes to the protocol, which she did.  This is also noted in the preliminary investigation report, document number 0201-K246314-10 "......after some mail corresponance I was told by Mats Gehlin to instead create and sign a new interrogation in DurTva, which was done on Thursday, August 26 with necessary changes. Unfortunately the documnet was dated and time stamped at the time of the correction as it is done automatically in the DurTva system."

The first interrogations by the police, that obviously are missing or have been tampered with, was according to one of the witnesses in the preliminary investigation report held with the two women together, according to Donald Bostrom, interrogated on September 20, 2010 page 53 in protocol with number 0201-K24633&-10 he says, "And then Anna calls again and tell me they have been to the police and Sofia told her story and yes, as I was there I filled in with a sentence. This is exactly how I remember she told, word by word.........but then Anna told me, as we were suddenly two women who had made a statement, against the same man it became public prosecution, and it turned into a complaint, eventhough we did not make a complaint."

A Swedish prosecutor must be objective in the pre-trial investigations and also bring to the case, matters that speak for the accused. It is remarkable that the prosecutor has not asked for the report of the interview made by the two women together as two witnesses are not supposed to be interrogated together so that they can coordinate their stories as it obviously happened at the Klara police station.
Reading the statments by the witnesses it also appears as if Anna Ardin was not having any issues with Assange until she found out that Sofia Wilen had had sex with Assange. It is also clear from the witness statements that Ardin and her journalist friends considered themselves superior to Sofia Wilen, she was referred to as the "cashmere girl" with "nice boobs" a "random woman" and as not having the same intellectual capacity as the others, including Anna Ardin. One can wonder why the police never asked Anna the question why she suddenly decided to "fill in with a sentence" at the police station, and if the truth of the matter is really that Anna Ardin felt insulted and hurt when she found out that Assange had sex with an inferior, random girl, when living and having sex with Anna at the same time.

It is remarkable that Swedish media cannot see how the management of this case severely damages the Swedish citizens' trust in a judicial process that is just, secure, effective, swift and reasonable priced.  I also think it is obvious that the Swedish police is corrupt but this is maybe something a Swedish journalist wouldn't  dare to write about.

Comments

1 - @Jansen. I think that everything Anna Ardin claims is inspired by what she heard Sofia Wilen say. She came up with a similar story just to "back up"
Wilen when they were interrogated together at the police station by Anna's friend. Then she acts surprised that Assange is accused of rape. Obviously the only forensic evidence Ardin had was a broken condom she brough to the police that the prosecutor cannot even prove was used by Assange. I do not think Ardin is strange she is a revengeful bitch, there are plenty of them around...I think to that Wilen and Assange could have sorted things out themselves if Ardin hadn't pushed Wilen to go to the police.

2 - After Anna Ardin thought that Assange damaged the condom it’s normal in that kind of situations that she directly try to stop the sex action and ask Assange to leave her flat. She did not. Witnesses also confirm that Anna Ardin behaved like nothing had happened after the alleged rape. The witnesses it also appears as if Anna Ardin was not having any issues with Assange until she found out that Sofia Wilen had had sex with Assang . Anna Ardin felt insulted and hurt when she found out that Assange had sex with an inferior, random girl, when living and having sex with Anna at the same time. It looks like that Anna is a strange women. I think not Sofia Wilen but Anna should have been sent to a psychotherapist. Marianne Ny has no witnesses and no forensic evidence that proves, beyond doubt, that Assange is guilty of any crimes. If I look to the face of Marianne Ny and see how she operate than I think the psychotherapist get it busy. The second case with Sofia Wilen is more complicate. If she is not infected than I think compassion with Assange after a letter of regret and a financial compensation of Assange is better for her than a trial of a kind of rape.

Post A Comment (comments are moderated before posted)

:-D:-o:-p:-x:-(:-):-\:angry::cool::cry::emb::grin::huh::laugh::lips::rolleyes:;-)

Follow Us

Facebook.pngspace.png twitter.pngspace.png rss2.png

Get the blog sent to your inbox by entering your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

svtworld.jpg

Showcase your Scandinavian business here

translate.jpg